{"id":816,"date":"2013-06-26T13:52:49","date_gmt":"2013-06-26T13:52:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/files\/2013\/06\/rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02.png"},"modified":"2013-06-26T13:52:49","modified_gmt":"2013-06-26T13:52:49","slug":"rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-2","status":"inherit","type":"attachment","link":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/a-unified-charge-current-vs-compact-model-for-graphene-transistors-applicable-in-analog-circuit-simulations\/rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Figure 2"},"author":370,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"description":{"rendered":"

\"Figure<\/a><\/p>\n"},"caption":{"rendered":"

Figure 2: Effective mobility versus carrier concentration in graphene on various substrates at room temperature. Graphene on h-BN offers the best-case effective mobility because it is lattice matched with graphene and has a weaker Fr\u00f6hlich coupling of surface polar phonons with graphene sheet ((S. Rakheja, V. Kumar, A. Naeemi, \u201cEvaluation of the potential performance of graphene nanoribbons as on-chip interconnects (invited),\u201d Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 101, no.7, 2013.)).<\/p>\n"},"alt_text":"Figure 2","media_type":"image","mime_type":"image\/png","media_details":{"width":506,"height":381,"file":"2013\/06\/rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02.png","sizes":{"thumbnail":{"file":"rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-150x150.png","width":150,"height":150,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/22\/files\/2013\/06\/rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-150x150.png"},"medium":{"file":"rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-300x225.png","width":300,"height":225,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/22\/files\/2013\/06\/rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-300x225.png"},"post-thumbnail":{"file":"rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-150x150.png","width":150,"height":150,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/22\/files\/2013\/06\/rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-150x150.png"},"abstract-thumb":{"file":"rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-220x165.png","width":220,"height":165,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/22\/files\/2013\/06\/rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02-220x165.png"},"full":{"file":"rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02.png","width":506,"height":381,"mime_type":"image\/png","source_url":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/22\/files\/2013\/06\/rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02.png"}},"image_meta":{"aperture":0,"credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":0,"copyright":"","focal_length":0,"iso":0,"shutter_speed":0,"title":""}},"post":809,"source_url":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-content\/blogs.dir\/22\/files\/2013\/06\/rakheja_vsmodelgraphene_02.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/816"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/attachment"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/370"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mtlsites.mit.edu\/annual_reports\/2013\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=816"}]}}