{"id":1852,"date":"2010-07-13T14:05:27","date_gmt":"2010-07-13T18:05:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wpmu2.mit.local\/?p=1852"},"modified":"2010-07-13T14:05:27","modified_gmt":"2010-07-13T18:05:27","slug":"optical-antenna-integrated-superconducting-nanowire-single-photon-detectors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wpmu2.mit.local\/optical-antenna-integrated-superconducting-nanowire-single-photon-detectors\/","title":{"rendered":"Optical-antenna-integrated Superconducting Nanowire Single-photon Detectors"},"content":{"rendered":"
We designed and fabricated superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) with nano-optical antennae to reduce the length of the nanowire needed for efficient optical coupling.\u00a0 In our design, we increased the pitch of the meander and added a gold nano-optical antenna structure together with a top reflector to enhance the absorptance of the niobium nitride (NbN) nanowire for transverse-magnetically (TM) polarized incident light.\u00a0 This structure simultaneously suppressed the absorptance of transverse-electrically (TE) polarized light.\u00a0 The mechanism by which the antennae increase the absorption of TM-polarized light can be understood by modeling the structure as an array of slot waveguides.\u00a0 We experimentally demonstrated 47% device efficiency for a 9 mm \u00d7 9 mm, 600-nm pitch SNSPD for the TM-polarization and 4% for the TE-polarization, consistent with theoretical predictions.\u00a0 The reduction of the length of the nanowire shortened the detection efficiency recovery time for the detector after pulsing.\u00a0 The total length of the antenna-coupled nanowire was 145 mm.\u00a0 Compared with a typical (non-antenna coupled), 200-nm pitch SNSPD with the same area, the length of the nanowire was reduced by 2\/3, and therefore the speed is expected to have been increased by a factor of 3.<\/p>\n
At MIT Lincoln Laboratory, this work was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Air Force Contract #FA8721-05-C-0002. Opinions, interpretations, recommendations and conclusions are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the United States Government.<\/p>\n